Is Accrual Accounting Actually Accurate?


Is Accrual Accounting Actually Accurate?

Accrual accounting seeks to temporally match expenses to revenues. That is, it corrects for time differences between when the cash from revenues is actually received by a business and when expenses are paid out by that business.

For example, in selling a product, firms frequently pay out cash for the manufacture of a widget and then pay to house that widget in a warehouse or retail location that was built at some earlier time. Cash from the sale of the widget sometimes comes in well after its manufacture date. Accrual accounting attempts to calculate those future earnings relative to the cost to produce them. Additionally, accrual accounting tries to quantify the cost of the wear and tear on equipment (i.e., depreciation) so that the value lost through usage is matched to the revenues earned by the product manufactured. And so on for many other business activities.

Given its philosophical underpinnings, accrual accounting, not surprisingly, relies on abstraction and human judgment. As it relates to the latter, accrual accounting is complex because it asks for judgment from the business executives themselves as well as their auditors, and, of course, from the research analysts and portfolio managers who are trying to assess the accuracy of those judgments. Throw in the economic incentives handed out to business executives, and you have a built-in impetus to nudge and fudge financial numbers in a preferred direction.

All of this, of course, raises the question of our recent CFA Institute Financial NewsBriefpoll: How accurate is accrual accounting in capturing actual business reality? Since many investing decisions depend on the accuracy of accrual accounting, this is a vital question.